Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
J Med Case Rep ; 17(1): 28, 2023 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2264652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Twin anemia polycythemia sequence is a rare complication in monochorionic twin pregnancy. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of dichorionic twin pregnancy presenting with suspected twin anemia polycythemia sequence. A 31-year-old White female, on her third pregnancy, had a routine ultrasound scan at 12 weeks gestation, which demonstrated a dichorionic twin pregnancy with one placenta located in the anterior wall and the other in the posterior wall of the uterus. At 21 weeks, a scan demonstrated a 24% growth discordance between the two fetuses with normal Doppler studies and amniotic fluid. At 27 weeks, one twin showed signs of anemia and the other polycythemia; the fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity was high in the anemic fetus and low in the polycythemic twin (1.8 and 0.5 multiples of the median). An intrauterine blood transfusion was carried out and this increased the fetal hemoglobin concentration in the anemic twin from 3.5 to 12.5 g/dL. At 29 weeks, delivery by cesarean section was carried out because of evidence from middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity of recurrence of anemia in one twin and worsening polycythemia in the co-twin; at birth the hemoglobin concentrations were 5.6 and 24.9 g/dL, respectively. Histopathological examination confirmed dichorionicity with no communicating vessels between the two placentas. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case of twin anemia polycythemia sequence in a dichorionic, diamniotic twin pregnancy where intrauterine blood transfusion was used to prolong the pregnancy by almost 2 weeks in a "twin anemia polycythemia sequence-like" setting.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Fetofetal Transfusion , Polycythemia , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Adult , Pregnancy, Twin , Fetofetal Transfusion/complications , Fetofetal Transfusion/diagnostic imaging , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Polycythemia/complications , Polycythemia/diagnostic imaging , Twins, Monozygotic , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/adverse effects , Anemia/etiology
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 141(2): 414-417, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190833

ABSTRACT

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered singleton, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates between April and June 2019, before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (pre-COVID-19), and between April and July 2020, during the pandemic (COVID-19 epoch). The primary outcome was the rate of undetected antenatal fetal growth restriction (FGR) in the two periods. A total of 268 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients who delivered small-for-gestational-age neonates during the COVID-19 epoch were significantly more likely to have undetected FGR compared with those who delivered pre-COVID-19 (70.1% vs 58.1%, P =.04). Patients who delivered SGA neonates during the COVID-19 epoch had more telehealth visits but fewer in-person prenatal visits, recorded fundal height measurements, and growth ultrasonograms. As telemedicine continues to be incorporated into prenatal care, these data may lend further support toward self-assessment of fundal height or routine third-trimester growth ultrasonograms to identify fetal growth abnormalities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fetal Growth Retardation , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , COVID-19/epidemiology , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Gestational Age
6.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(15): 1605-1613, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1900709

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with poor neonatal outcomes and stillbirth, and screening via fundal height or ultrasound is routinely performed. During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we developed a hybrid model of prenatal care which decreased the frequency of in-person visits and incorporated telemedicine visits. We sought to determine if prenatal FGR diagnoses decreased with this hybrid model compared with routine prenatal care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton nonanomalous neonates with birth weights <10th percentile at term. The "routine care" group was consisted of those who born between April and July 2019 with in-person prenatal care, and the "hybrid care" group was consisted of those who born between April and July 2020 with both in-person and telemedicine prenatal cares at a collaborative academic practice. The primary outcome was the rate of diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA) as defined as infant birth weight <10th percentile without a prenatal diagnosis of FGR. The secondary outcome was timing of diagnosis of FGR. RESULTS: Overall, 1,345 and 1,296 women gave birth in the routine and hybrid groups, respectively. The number of in-person prenatal care visits decreased from 15,024 in the routine period to 7,727 in the hybrid period; 3,265 telemedicine visits occurred during the hybrid period. The total number of prenatal patients remained relatively stable at 3,993 and 3,753 between periods. Third trimester ultrasounds decreased from 2,929 to 2,014 between periods. Birth weights <10 percentile occurred in 115 (8.6%) births during the routine period and 79 (6.1%) births during the hybrid period. Of 115, 44 (38.3%) cases were prenatally diagnosed with FGR in the routine versus 28 of 79 (35.4%) in the hybrid group (p = 0.76). Median gestational age at diagnosis did not vary between groups (36 vs. 37 weeks, p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: A hybrid prenatal care model did not alter the detection of FGR. Future efforts should further explore the benefits of incorporating telemedicine into prenatal care. KEY POINTS: · Telemedicine visits can provide comprehensive prenatal care.. · FGR was diagnosed equally with hybrid versus routine prenatal care.. · FGR diagnosis was not delayed with hybrid care..


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fetal Growth Retardation , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging , Prenatal Care , Birth Weight , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Prenatal Diagnosis , Gestational Age , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
7.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(7): 2680-2683, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1882860

ABSTRACT

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on maternal and foetal Doppler findings. Doppler ultrasound findings were compared in 40 pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 disease who required hospitalisation (group 1) and 30 healthy pregnant women (group 2). Maternal characteristics and birth histories were recorded. Body mass index, gestational week at birth, type of delivery, oligihydroamnios, pre-term birth (<37 weeks), low birth weight (<10 percentile), perinatal death and f1st and 5th minute Apgar scores were recorded. Birth weights and foetal biophysical profile (BPP) scores in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 2. There was a statistically significant between-group difference in the umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), umbilical artery resistive index (RI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, MCA RI, mean uterine artery (UtA) PI, mean UtA RI and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), the parameters used to evaluate foetal-maternal blood flow. In the pregnant group diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalised, all foetal-maternal Doppler indicators of foetal-maternal blood flow were impaired, and birth weights and BPP scores in these patients were statistically significantly lower than those in the healthy controls.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Foetal and maternal vascular malperfusion characterised by decidual arteriopathy have been reported in pathologies of placentas from pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection.What the results of this study add? It was determined that COVID-19 disrupted foetal and maternal blood flow.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Foetal biometric measurements and foetal Doppler may be useful in the follow-up of perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnant Women , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Birth Weight , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Umbilical Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Middle Cerebral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Pulsatile Flow
9.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 58(6): 909-915, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1616098

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the characteristics of ectopic pregnancies (EPs) in the year prior to vs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of women diagnosed with an EP on transvaginal sonography conducted at a center in London, UK, providing early-pregnancy assessment, between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. Women were identified via the Astraia ultrasound reporting system using coded and non-coded outcomes of EP or pregnancy outside the uterine cavity. Data related to predefined outcomes were collected using Astraia and Cerner electronic reporting systems. Main outcome measures included clinical, ultrasound and biochemical features of EP, in addition to reported complications and management. RESULTS: There were 22 683 consultations over the 2-year period. Following consultation, a similar number and proportion of EPs were diagnosed in 2019 (141/12 657 (1%)) and 2020 (134/10 026 (1%)). Both cohorts were comparable in age, ethnicity, weight and method of conception. Gestational age at the first transvaginal sonography scan and at diagnosis were similar, and no difference in location, size or morphology of EP was found between the two cohorts. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels at the time of EP diagnosis were higher in 2020 than in 2019 (1005 IU/L vs 665 IU/L; P = 0.03). The proportions of women according to type of final EP management were similar, but the rate of failed first-line management was higher during vs before the pandemic (16% vs 6%; P = 0.01). The rates of blood detected in the pelvis (hemoperitoneum) on ultrasound (23% vs 26%; P = 0.58) and of ruptured EP confirmed surgically (9% vs 3%; P = 0.07) were similar in 2019 vs 2020. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in the location, size, morphology or gestational age at the first ultrasound examination or at diagnosis of EP between women diagnosed before vs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Complication rates and final management strategy were also unchanged. However, hCG levels and the failure rate of first-line conservative management measures were higher during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that women continued to access appropriate care for EP during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no evidence of diagnostic delay or an increase in adverse outcome in our population. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Ectopic/diagnosis , Prenatal Care/standards , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , London , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Ectopic/blood , Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
10.
J Perinat Med ; 50(2): 139-143, 2022 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1561422

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term effects of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on the fetal immune system by fetal thymus size measurements with ultrasound (USG). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in the Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between November 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021, with recovered, pregnant women, four weeks after they had been confirmed for the SARS-CoV-2 infection by real-time polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR). COVID-19 recovered (CR) pregnant women compared with age-matched pregnant controls in terms of demographic features, fetal thymic-thoracic ratio (TTR), and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic features between the two groups. TTR found significantly lower in the CR group than the control group (p=0.001). The fetal TTR showed a significant and moderate correlation with maternal monocyte counts, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and red cell distribution width (RDW); while it did not correlate with lymphocyte counts, c-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) reduces fetal thymus size in pregnant women with mild or moderate symptoms after recovery from the infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Fetus/pathology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/pathology , Thymus Gland/pathology , Adult , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Female , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Organ Size , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Thymus Gland/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Young Adult
11.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(8): 830-835, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1545708

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-related changes in the antenatal utilization of high-risk obstetric services. Our secondary objective was to characterize change in stillbirth rate during the pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, observational study performed at a single, tertiary care center. Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) visits, ultrasounds, and antenatal tests of fetal well-being during the pandemic epoch (2020), which spans the first 12 weeks of the year to include pandemic onset and implementation of mitigation efforts, were compared with the same epoch of the three preceding years visually and using general linear models to account for week and year effect. An analysis of stillbirth rate comparing the pandemic time period to prepandemic was also performed. RESULTS: While there were decreased MFM visits and antenatal tests of fetal well-being during the pandemic epoch compared with prepandemic epochs, only the decrease in MFM visits by year was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The stillbirth rate during the pandemic epoch was not significantly different when compared with the prepandemic period and accounting for both week (p = 0.286) and year (p = 0.643) effect. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant decrease in MFM visits, whereas obstetric ultrasounds and antenatal tests of fetal well-being remained unchanged. While we observed no change in the stillbirth rate compared with the prepandemic epoch, our study design and sample size preclude us from making assumptions of association. Our findings may support future work investigating how changes in prenatal care for high-risk obstetric patients influence perinatal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · MFM visits significantly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic epoch.. · The overall stillbirth rate during the COVID-19 pandemic epoch was not significantly changed.. · Larger studies are needed to capitalize on these changes to evaluate rare outcomes such as stillbirth..


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Female , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
12.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(11): 2507-2512, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1473881
13.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 155(3): 450-454, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1400847

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fetal lung development using pulmonary artery Doppler in pregnant women who had recovered from COVID-19. METHODS: The prospective case-control study included 41 pregnant women who had recovered from COVID-19 and 43 healthy pregnant women (control group). All the women in the study group had been diagnosed with COVID-19 and had completed a quarantine period. RESULTS: The demographic data of patients were similar in the groups (P > 0.05). Main pulmonary artery peak systolic velocity was higher and pulsatility indices were lower in pregnant women who recovered from COVID-19 compared to the controls (P < 0.001, P = 0.001). Acceleration time, ejection time, and acceleration/ejection time ratio (PATET) of the fetal MPA Doppler were significantly decreased in pregnant women who recovered from COVID-19 (P < 0.001, P = 0.036, and P = 0.002, respectively). The patients who had recovered from COVID-19 were divided into two groups: those treated with expectant management and those treated in hospital. The pulmonary artery acceleration time and PATET ratio were significantly lower in the group treated in the hospital (P = 0.023 and P = 0.045, respectively). CONCLUSION: Detailed Doppler evaluations of the pulmonary artery may help in evaluating the fetal adverse effects of COVID-19 disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Artery , Blood Flow Velocity , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Artery/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
14.
BJOG ; 128(9): 1464-1474, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1337350

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes before and after implementation of medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) without ultrasound via telemedicine. DESIGN: Cohort analysis. SETTING: The three main abortion providers. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Medical abortions at home at ≤69 days' gestation in two cohorts: traditional model (in-person with ultrasound, n = 22 158) from January to March 2020 versus telemedicine-hybrid model (either in person or via telemedicine without ultrasound, n = 29 984, of whom 18 435 had no-test telemedicine) between April and June 2020. Sample (n = 52 142) comprises 85% of all medical abortions provided nationally. METHODS: Data from electronic records and incident databases were used to compare outcomes between cohorts, adjusted for baseline differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment success, serious adverse events, waiting times, gestation at treatment, acceptability. RESULTS: Mean waiting time from referral to treatment was 4.2 days shorter in the telemedicine-hybrid model and more abortions were provided at ≤6 weeks' gestation (40% versus 25%, P < 0.001). Treatment success (98.8% versus 98.2%, P > 0.999), serious adverse events (0.02% versus 0.04%, P = 0.557) and incidence of ectopic pregnancy (0.2% versus 0.2%, P = 0.796) were not different between models. In the telemedicine-hybrid model, 0.04% were estimated to be over 10 weeks' gestation at the time of the abortion; all were completed safely at home. Within the telemedicine-hybrid model, effectiveness was higher with telemedicine than in-person care (99.2% versus 98.1%, P < 0.001). Acceptability of telemedicine was high (96% satisfied) and 80% reported a future preference for telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: A telemedicine-hybrid model for medical abortion that includes no-test telemedicine and treatment without an ultrasound is effective, safe, acceptable and improves access to care. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Compelling evidence from 52 142 women shows no-test telemedicine abortion is safe, effective and improves care.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/methods , Telemedicine/methods , Abortion, Induced/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/statistics & numerical data
15.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 58(1): 111-120, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1293334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare ultrasound and Doppler findings in pregnant women who were positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with findings in those who were SARS-CoV-2-negative, evaluated during the pandemic period. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, we analyzed data from 106 pregnant women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of, or within 1 week of, an ultrasound scan between 1 May and 31 August 2020. Scans were either performed for routine fetal evaluation or indicated due to a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Forty-nine women were symptomatic and 57 were asymptomatic. For comparison, we analyzed data from 103 pregnant women matched for maternal age, parity, body mass index and gestational age at the time of the ultrasound scan. These control women did not report symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of the ultrasound scan or at the time of admission for delivery and had a negative SARS-CoV-2 test at admission for delivery. Fetal biometry, fetal anatomy, amniotic fluid volume and Doppler parameters, including umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery pulsatility indices, cerebroplacental ratio and biophysical profile (BPP), were evaluated as indicated. Biometric and Doppler values were converted to Z-scores for comparison. Our primary outcome, an adverse prenatal composite outcome (APCO) included any one or more of: small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetus, oligohydramnios, abnormal BPP, abnormal Doppler velocimetry and fetal death. Comorbidities, delivery information and neonatal outcome were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eighty-seven (82.1%) women who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 had a body mass index > 25 kg/m2 . SARS-CoV-2-positive women had a higher prevalence of diabetes (26/106 (24.5%) vs 13/103 (12.6%); P = 0.03), but not of pre-eclampsia (21/106 (19.8%) vs 11/103 (10.7%); P = 0.08), compared with controls. The prevalence of APCO was not significantly different between SARS-CoV-2-positive women (19/106 (17.9%)) and controls (9/103 (8.7%)) (P = 0.06). There were no differences between SARS-CoV-2-positive women and controls in the prevalence of SGA fetuses (12/106 (11.3%) vs 6/103 (5.8%); P = 0.17), fetuses with abnormal Doppler evaluation (8/106 (7.5%) vs 2/103 (1.9%); P = 0.08) and fetuses with abnormal BPP (4/106 (3.8%) vs 0/103 (0%); P = 0.14). There were two fetal deaths in women who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and these women had a higher rate of preterm delivery ≤ 35 weeks of gestation (22/106 (20.8%) vs 9/103 (8.7%); odds ratio, 2.73 (95% CI, 1.19-6.3); P = 0.01) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in abnormal fetal ultrasound and Doppler findings observed between pregnant women who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and controls. However, preterm delivery ≤ 35 weeks was more frequent among SARS-CoV-2-positive women. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/statistics & numerical data , Umbilical Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
16.
Echocardiography ; 38(8): 1314-1318, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1286671

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the fetal pulmonary system using the acceleration time (AT), ejection time (ET), and acceleration/ejection time ratio (PATET) of the fetal main pulmonary artery Doppler waveform. METHODS: We prospectively studied pregnant women attending our hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR test and an age-matched control group who admitted for routine prenatal care. An ultrasound examination that included measurements of the AT, ET, and AT/ET ratio (PATET) were performed and the results were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-five SARS-CoV-2-infected and 93 control group pregnant women were included in this study. AT found higher in the COVID-19 positive group when compared with controls. When the ET and PATET parameters were compared, no differences were detected between the groups. Eleven neonates had Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) requirement in the COVID-19 positive group while there were none in the control group. All fetal pulmonary artery Doppler values were decreased in NICU admitted fetuses. The mean gestational week of this group was lower than non-NICU COVID-19 positive group and the control group. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection increases fetal pulmonary blood flow, which appears high AT values on Doppler parameters. NICU admission only occurred in the COVID-19 group and their Doppler values were found significantly lower than non-NICU COVID-19 group. The clinical significance of this result must be evaluated with further studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Female , Fetus , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Artery/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
17.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0253796, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1282315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated an increased stillbirth rate. It was suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted on attendances for reduced fetal movements. Thus, we sought to ascertain the impact of the pandemic on attendances for reduced fetal movements (RFM) in our unit, ultrasound provision for reduced fetal movements, and the stillbirth rate. METHODS: This was a single site retrospective cohort study involving all women complaining of a 1st episode of reduced fetal movements between 01/03/2020-30/04/2020 (COVID) to 01/03/2019-30/04/2019 (Pre-COVID). Data were retrieved from computerised hospital records and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism and SPSS. RESULTS: 22% (179/810) of women presented with a 1st episode of reduced fetal movements Pre-COVID compared to 18% (145/803) during COVID (p = 0.047). Primiparous women were significantly over-represented in this population with a 1.4-fold increase in attendances during COVID (67% vs 48%, p = 0.0005). Neither the total stillbirth rate nor the stillbirth rate amongst women who presented with reduced fetal movements changed during COVID. Ultrasound provision was not impacted by COVID with 95% of the scans performed according to local guidelines, compared to Pre-COVID (74%, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant decrease in 1st attendances for reduced fetal movements during COVID-19 pandemic. Primiparous women were 1.4 times more likely to attend with RFM. Women should be reassured that COVID-19 has not resulted in a decreased provision of care for RFM, and has not impacted on the stillbirth rate.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Fetal Growth Retardation , Fetal Movement , SARS-CoV-2 , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
18.
Am J Perinatol ; 38(7): 747-752, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1182901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A majority of studies evaluating the risk of vertical transmission and adverse outcomes in pregnancies with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are mostly based on third-trimester infections. There is limited data available on pregnancy sequelae of maternal infection in the first or second trimester. STUDY DESIGN: We present a patient with monochorionic-diamniotic twins that develops coronavirus disease 2019 infection at 15 weeks of gestation. The pregnancy is further complicated by stage II twin-twin transfusion syndrome. She undergoes laser ablation, which is complicated by development of a subchorionic hematoma. The patient then develops Escherichia coli bacteremia, resulting in septic shock and preterm labor followed by previable delivery at 21 weeks of gestation. Amniotic fluid and placenta were negative for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSION: This case of SARS-CoV-2 argues against transplacental transmission after a second-trimester infection but brings attention to the possible downstream complications that may arise following early infection. KEY POINTS: · Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is not evident after a second-trimester infection.. · Antepartum coronavirus disease 2019 may cause vascular placental changes and placental insufficiency.. · SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a maternal hypercoagulable state with adverse perinatal outcomes..


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Escherichia coli Infections , Fetofetal Transfusion , Placenta , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Shock, Septic , Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/physiopathology , Escherichia coli Infections/complications , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Female , Fetofetal Transfusion/diagnosis , Fetofetal Transfusion/etiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Placenta/diagnostic imaging , Placenta/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/physiopathology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Twin , Premature Birth/etiology , Premature Birth/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Shock, Septic/etiology , Twins, Monozygotic , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods
19.
Contraception ; 104(1): 49-53, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1157218

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effectiveness of medication abortion with the implementation of telemedicine and a no-test protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a medication abortion up to 77 days gestation at the University of Hawai'i between April and November 2020. Patients had the option of traditional in clinic care or telemedicine with either in clinic pickup or mailing of medications. During this time, a no-test protocol for medication abortion without prior labs or ultrasound was in place for eligible patients. The primary outcome was the rate of successful medication abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included abortion-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were dispensed mifepristone and misoprostol, 149 (44.6%) with telemedicine with in-person pickup of medications, 75 (22.5%) via telemedicine with medications mailed, and 110 (32.9%) via traditional in person visits. The overall rate of complete medication abortion without surgical intervention was 95.8%, with success rates of 96.8, 97.1, and 93.6% for the clinic pickup, mail, and clinic visit groups, respectively. Success for those without an ultrasound performed prior to the procedure was 96.6%, compared to 95.5% for those with ultrasound. We obtained follow-up data for 87.8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Medication abortion was safe and effective while offering multiple modes of care delivery including telemedicine visits without an ultrasound performed prior to dispensing medications. IMPLICATIONS: Incorporating telemedicine and a no-test protocol for medication abortion is safe and has the potential to expand access to abortion care. All care models had low rates of adverse events, which contradicts the idea that the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategyincreases the safety of medication abortion.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents , Abortion, Induced/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , Mifepristone , Misoprostol , Telemedicine/methods , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Adult , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/trends , Female , Hawaii , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
20.
J Perinat Med ; 49(6): 697-701, 2021 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1117164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on fetal Doppler parameters. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study conducted in Ankara City Hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnants between August 1, 2020 and October 1, 2020. There were 54 COVID-19 confirmed pregnant women and 97 age-matched pregnant women as a control group between 28 and 39 weeks. Infection was confirmed based on positive real-time polymerase-chain reaction results. Demographic features, uterine artery (right, left), umblical artery, middle cerebral artery, ductus venosus, cerebro-placental ratio, and cerebral-placental-uterine ratio Doppler parameters were investigated in both groups. RESULTS: Two groups were similar in terms of demographic features and no difference was found for fetal Doppler parameters. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 seems to have no adverse effect on fetoplacental circulation in mild and moderate patients during the acute phase of the infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL